reference — in the room
Latency numbers
in short — written for this site
Each step is roughly ten times the last. This is why memory beats disk and why the round trip is the enemy.
from the primer — full sectionsynced
Latency Comparison Numbers -------------------------- L1 cache reference 0.5 ns Branch mispredict 5 ns L2 cache reference 7 ns 14x L1 cache Mutex lock/unlock 25 ns Main memory reference 100 ns 20x L2 cache, 200x L1 cache Compress 1K bytes with Zippy 10,000 ns 10 us Send 1 KB bytes over 1 Gbps network 10,000 ns 10 us Read 4 KB randomly from SSD* 150,000 ns 150 us ~1GB/sec SSD Read 1 MB sequentially from memory 250,000 ns 250 us Round trip within same datacenter 500,000 ns 500 us Read 1 MB sequentially from SSD* 1,000,000 ns 1,000 us 1 ms ~1GB/sec SSD, 4X memory HDD seek 10,000,000 ns 10,000 us 10 ms 20x datacenter roundtrip Read 1 MB sequentially from 1 Gbps 10,000,000 ns 10,000 us 10 ms 40x memory, 10X SSD Read 1 MB sequentially from HDD 30,000,000 ns 30,000 us 30 ms 120x memory, 30X SSD Send packet CA->Netherlands->CA 150,000,000 ns 150,000 us 150 ms Notes ----- 1 ns = 10^-9 seconds 1 us = 10^-6 seconds = 1,000 ns 1 ms = 10^-3 seconds = 1,000 us = 1,000,000 ns
Handy metrics based on numbers above:
- Read sequentially from HDD at 30 MB/s
- Read sequentially from 1 Gbps Ethernet at 100 MB/s
- Read sequentially from SSD at 1 GB/s
- Read sequentially from main memory at 4 GB/s
- 6-7 world-wide round trips per second
- 2,000 round trips per second within a data center
Latency numbers visualized
Source(s) and further reading
sourcedonnemartin/system-design-primer / README.mdanchor#latency-numbers-every-programmer-should-knowsyncedsynced from donnemartin/system-design-primer@master · 2026-08-16